Read

User menu

Search form

New Bank Leak Shows How British Rich Exploit Tax Haven Loopholes

New Bank Leak Shows How British Rich Exploit Tax Haven Loopholes
Tue, 7/15/2014 - by ICIJ
This article originally appeared on The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

The identities of thousands of wealthy offshore clients of a major Channel Isles private bank have been leaked to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.

The individuals include donors to the British government, which has been outspoken against tax havens, and some of the most prominent people in British life.

The ICIJ has exclusively allowed The Guardian to analyze more than 20,000 of the names, all of whom had dealings with a discreet Jersey, Channel Islands branch of Kleinwort Benson, a famous London firm which specializes in “wealth management.”

In the interests of transparency, ICIJ and The Guardian will publish some of their findings over the coming days, detailing the offshore links of political donors; international celebrities; judges; sportsmen; businessmen; and British aristocrats.

Names range from vacuum cleaner tycoon James Dyson to Hollywood actor Mel Gibson. Today The Guardian identifies party donors who over the years have paid more than £8m to the governing Conservative party.

One of the recipients of donations is Britain’s newly-promoted financial services minister, Andrea Leadsom, who has run into a “Cash for Office” allegation after she told The Guardian she was unaware of the size of large offshore donations to the Conservatives made by her own family.

The ICIJ has previously published secret internal records of offshore companies in the British Virgin Islands. ICIJ director, Gerard Ryle, said: “We make this information available not because what we found is illegal but because we think most people would think it unfair. Tax havens allow some people to play by different rules.”

At a time of debate about inequalities of wealth in the U.K., the data leaks reveal how the very richest families dip in and out of British jurisdiction as it suits them, exploiting what academic experts call Jersey's 'fictitious space.'

British finance minister David Gauke last year called for transparency from users of the tax haven, saying: “The time has come for those with hidden offshore interests to come forward.”

A British government report stated: “In the past, offshore accounts and other complex arrangements were shrouded in secrecy, so some people felt that they could dodge their tax obligations ... Those days are gone.”

Government ministers launched a scheme for Jersey account-holders to make disclosure. They claimed the big challenge the authorities face is secret tax evasion, which is a crime.

The British Chancellor George Osborne announced in April: “If you’re evading tax offshore, there is no safe haven and we will find you.”

But The Guardian findings contradict this picture of illegality. Many Jersey loopholes used by wealthy Britons to pass on their fortunes appear from The Guardian’s research to have been perfectly legal.

Both the ruling Conservatives and to a lesser extent the Labour opposition party have benefited by political donations from such individuals.

There is no published register of trusts or offshore holdings, and the rich appear to have often been able discreetly to avoid taxes, particularly inheritance tax, in ways too expensive for smaller people to use.

Children and other beneficiaries may have often had no hand in it themselves. The Earl of Guilford, for example, told The Guardian: “I inherited money from a deceased relative that was held in an offshore trust ...I have ... made full disclosure of this to HMRC [the British tax authorities]. You will understand that I did not establish an offshore account and was faced with the decision as to what to do with this money.”

Originally published by The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

Ending fascists’ grip on power not only requires voting them out, but replacing them with the right people.

One pressing question is how the worldwide outrage might, and could, spread to his other business interests, not least his largest interest: SpaceX.

There is a real human cost behind cold, calculated “efficiency.”

Musk's unelected role at the forefront of U.S. government, and his company's near monopolisation of satellite internet communications, increases his global political and economic power grab, and attacks on democracy.

Ending fascists’ grip on power not only requires voting them out, but replacing them with the right people.

One pressing question is how the worldwide outrage might, and could, spread to his other business interests, not least his largest interest: SpaceX.

There is a real human cost behind cold, calculated “efficiency.”

Musk's unelected role at the forefront of U.S. government, and his company's near monopolisation of satellite internet communications, increases his global political and economic power grab, and attacks on democracy.

In many European countries, the far right holds or shares power. Democracy is in crisis.

Posted 1 month 3 weeks ago

If Trump indeed tanks your 401(k) to make himself and his friends even richer, the opposition party should make that the centerpiece of their attack heading into next year’s election.

Posted 1 month 3 weeks ago

Yarvin saw the “red pill” as the realization that the Enlightenment ideals he came to associate with “the cathedral” and democracy are actually a poison leading to societal decadence and decline.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

As the American public continues to publicly stand up to the administration, Trump’s grip on power will eventually slip.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

It is clear that authoritarian fascists, in the United States and elsewhere, do not want education that promotes critical thinking.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

Musk's unelected role at the forefront of U.S. government, and his company's near monopolisation of satellite internet communications, increases his global political and economic power grab, and attacks on democracy.

There is a real human cost behind cold, calculated “efficiency.”