Read

User menu

Search form

Leggo My Ovaries

Leggo My Ovaries
Fri, 5/4/2012

Photo: The People's Record

Sexist mandate after intrusive mandate, American women are clinging on to their reproductive rights by a single thread. Nearly 40 years after the landmark decision of Roe v. Wade, conservative politicians are spearheading gross violations that are mere chauvinistic displays of power to appeal to the religious Right. The Right’s political race for the presidency has revealed an all-out assault by conservative legislators flexing their patriarchal muscles to chain down women’s rights once more.

The question is: how long are we going to tolerate it?

Accessible reproductive healthcare, including birth control and abortions, are vital aspects of the fight for women’s rights and equality. The state – as always, mostly elected male officials – telling American women what they can and cannot do with their bodies is as clear and brutal form of oppression as it gets. While the income disparity between men and women still remains an issue of inequality, giving the state complete jurisdiction over a woman’s body is once again on the table for debate in 2012. Imagine.

A Double Standard

One in three women has an abortion during her lifetime. As accessible reproductive care for women has now officially been labeled for “sluts,” women face two opposing categories to fall into: the slut and the virgin. Republicans are openly vilifying women for taking control of their healthcare (cue in Rush Limbaugh, Mitt Romney etc.) instead of lending it over to men who will never get pregnant. The one-in-three statistic demonstrates the vast need for safe and accessible reproductive healthcare on demand and without apology.

At the heart of this debate is whether women or the state should have control over our healthcare. While men are never even questioned about their sexual health – especially by the state – women are expected to succumb to a brand of misogyny that reduces them to sex-crazed nymphomaniacs when they take the responsibility of contraception seriously.

Need we say: Women are not farm animals. Yet the “Women as Livestock” bill recently passed by the Georgia State Senate is a perfect example of the immoral, patriarchal chains in which women are becoming increasingly confined. Rep. Terry England (R-Auburn) said if farmers have to “deliver calves, dead or alive,” then a woman carrying a dead fetus or one not expected to survive should also have to carry it to term. The physical and psychological turmoil a woman must go through to deliver a stillborn baby is something Mr. England will never have to endure, but expects women to handle without a flinch. The bill, which does not include any exemptions for rape or incest, outlaws abortions after 20 weeks even though Roe v. Wade guarantees abortions up to 24 weeks.

But it isn't just the politicians who are literally treating women like farm creatures; so are many anti-choice groups as well. Conservative anti-choice female groups have been all the while on the sidelines cheering their conservative cronies to launch women back to the early 1900s: the time of the coat hanger. American women’s right to self-determination cannot, legally and morally, be threatened by the religious right in an attempt to police the bodies of women. But as long as conservatives are valuing the life of a fetus or even a fertilized egg more than that of a person, women cannot and will not be liberated.

A bi-partisan sexist attack

Nor have the Democrats been blameless in the war on women. After the Obama administration announced federal legislation requiring employee healthcare plans to cover birth control—which is used by 99 percent of sexually active women—President Obama folded under the conservative backlash and quickly searched for a compromise. Instead, he said, insurers, not employers, would be the ones responsible for covering birth control, forcing women through a maze of insurance policy dead ends to receive basic healthcare. This is untenable. An employer’s religious beliefs cannot constitutionally supersede a female employee’s right to reproductive medical attention. In doing this, President Obama has become one more spectator watching women’s fundamental human rights being stripped away across the country.

What’s worse is that this isn’t just a question of contraception: it puts preventative healthcare measures such as mammograms and other cancer screenings at risk as well. Not only are some states confiscating women’s rights, but states are putting women’s lives at risk by having them chase down and pay directly out of pocket for standard medical procedures.

We, as women, cannot claim equality if someone else has control over our bodies. A woman’s right to self-determination is not a political litmus test. It is a fundamental human right that is on the brink of annihilation. We demand full coverage, accessible healthcare and complete control of our bodies without apology and without reprimand. And if they do not or cannot give us those things then they don't know what's coming to them.

 

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

Former President Donald Trump is now openly fantasizing about deputizing death squads against Americans.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

Former President Donald Trump is now openly fantasizing about deputizing death squads against Americans.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

Posted 1 week 6 days ago

Former President Donald Trump is growing increasingly deranged, yet the media is asleep at the wheel.

Posted 1 month 4 weeks ago

Former President Donald Trump is now openly fantasizing about deputizing death squads against Americans.

Posted 1 month 1 hour ago

The 2024 Republican ticket’s incitement of violence against Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, is revealing in more ways than one.

Posted 1 month 2 weeks ago

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

Posted 3 weeks 3 days ago

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.