Read

User menu

Search form

United Republic Poll: 72% of Americans Want Anti-Corruption Laws and Money Out of Politics

United Republic Poll: 72% of Americans Want Anti-Corruption Laws and Money Out of Politics
Thu, 12/12/2013 - by Michael Beckel
This article originally appeared on The Center for Public Integrity

How important is reducing the influence of money in politics to Americans? It depends on how you ask the question.

A new poll sponsored by the campaign reform advocacy group United Republic, through its Represent.us project, concludes more than 60 percent of Americans would strongly support “a federal law that imposes tough, new campaign finance laws for politicians, lobbyists and super PACs.”

That’s not an unimpressive figure, but strong support for a reform law jumped to about 72 percent when respondents were asked about “tough, new anti-corruption laws” instead of “campaign finance” ones, according to polling documents reviewed by the Center for Public Integrity.

Josh Silver, Represent.Us’s director, said his organization’s poll “confirms that while Americans may support campaign finance reform, they are truly fired up about corruption.”

“Conservatives, progressives, and independents are all willing to support bold reforms, provided that we stop using dated, inaccessible language and start defining this issue in terms everyone can get behind,” he continued.

Most Americans, regardless of political affiliation, aren’t impressed with the country’s elections or integrity of officeholders, according to the poll’s findings.

More than seven in 10 respondents agreed that the U.S. election system was “biased in favor of the candidate with the most money.” Only 15 percent said that the system was “equally fair to all candidates.”

And 51 percent agreed with the statement that “most politicians” are “corrupt.”

Republicans were slightly more likely than Democrats to believe most politicians are corrupt. About 53 percent affirmed that statement, versus nearly 45 percent of Democrats.

Yet independents viewed politicians least favorably of all — with about 56 percent agreeing that most politicians are corrupt.

Additionally, vast majorities of poll respondents thought many groups wield too much influence over the country’s government, including “labor unions” (61.4 percent), “special interests” (76.5 percent), “super PACs” (77 percent), “the wealthiest 1 percent” (77.2 percent), “Wall Street and corporations” (81.2 percent), “lobbyists” (82.9 percent) and “Big Money” (88.3 percent).

With poll numbers like this, it’s no wonder that the American League of Lobbyists recently changed its name to the National Association of Government Relations Professionals.

Represent.us hired pollsters MFour Market Research and Tulchin Research to conduct the poll, which contacted 1,003 Americans last month and was “controlled and weighted to reflect U.S. voter demographics.” Those contacted say they at least vote in “most elections.”

The margin of error for most poll questions is plus or minus 3.5 percent, according to the group.

Originally published by The Center for Public Integrity

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

Posted 2 weeks 6 days ago

Former President Donald Trump is now openly fantasizing about deputizing death squads against Americans.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

The 2024 Republican ticket’s incitement of violence against Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, is revealing in more ways than one.

Posted 1 month 3 weeks ago

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

Posted 1 month 1 day ago

What Britain needs now is more politics, not more police.

Posted 1 month 3 weeks ago

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.