Read

User menu

Search form

Indigenous Blockade of B.C. Pipeline Spurs Apache Corp To Abandon Kitimat Gas Project

Indigenous Blockade of B.C. Pipeline Spurs Apache Corp To Abandon Kitimat Gas Project
Tue, 8/5/2014 - by Jenny Uechi
This article originally appeared on Vancouver Observer

The future of a major LNG project in Kitimat, British Columbia, has been thrown into uncertainty, after one of its main backers has decided to walk out. Houston-based Apache Corporation says it will leave Kitimat LNG, which was a joint project with Chevron.

"Consistent with the company's ongoing repositioning for profitable and repeatable North American onshore growth, Apache intends to completely exit the Wheatstone and Kitimat LNG projects," the company just announced in its second-quarter report.

The news comes only one month after Premier Christy Clark took a tour of the Kitimat LNG site, and took photos with workers to promote the project. Even though the BC government has ambitious plans to build several LNG terminals in the province, with three built by 2020, some experts have warned that the proposals could be undermined by much nimbler global competitors and sinking gas prices in Asia.

To date, Kitimat LNG is the only LNG export facility (of 16 proposed) that has been granted an environmental assessment certificate by the province.

"While today’s news that Apache intends to leave the Kitimat LNG project changes the ownership structure of that particular proposal, we remain committed to developing a competitive liquefied natural gas export industry in British Columbia," the Premier's office told The Vancouver Observer.

"We look forward to hearing more details about Kitimat LNG’s future as the project moves forward, and encourage people to speak directly with either Apache or Chevron about their commercial business decisions."

A Victory for LNG Opponents?

The Kitimat LNG project was also the first to get export approval in Canada, and was the furthest along among the 16 LNG export projects in BC. The project was supposed to have been supplied by the proposed Pacific Trails Pipeline, which is currently being protested by a "soft blockade" at the Unist'ot'en Camp in Wet'suwet'en First Nation territory.

The protest camp claimed Apache's exit was a 'victory' for LNG opponents in northern BC.

"Unist'ot'en Camp is claiming the recent announcement from Apache as a victory," a representative of the camp wrote on the group's website. "This is because all of the original investors (Encana, EOG, and now Apache) are bailing on the Pacific Trails Pipeline project." (In a separate incident recently, the Wet'suwet'en people expelled a TransCanada work crew from their lands).

The Mayor of Kitimat, who has expressed strong support for the economic growth brought by the LNG boom, remained tight-lipped about the news.

"We won't have anything to say until tomorrow because we don't know enough yet," Kitimat Mayor Joanne Monaghan said last week. However, she said she believes "absolutely" that other LNG projects for the area will continue to be developed.

Outside of Kitimat, LNG proposals face some stiff opposition from First Nations and northern BC residents who way the environmental costs of the projects will outweigh possible economic benefits.

An Uncertain Future

Chevron would not confirm whether it would be able to move forward with the project without Apache.

"Chevron cannot comment on Apache’s plans to manage their joint venture interest in the Kitimat and Wheatstone LNG projects," Chevron-Apache LNG project communications manager Gillian Robinson Riddell said Thursday.

But analysts predict that Chevron will not proceed with the multi-billion-dollar project.

“The odds increase that there will be no Kitimat (LNG),” said Fadel Gheit, an analyst with Oppenheimer & Co. in New York, in an interview with Bloomberg.

“I would not think that they would be interested in going it alone. They had a bad experience in Australia with Gorgon and their co-pilots were Exxon, the best in the business,” he added.

Earlier this year, Apache had announced it was reducing its spending for Kitimat LNG, saying it was cutting its budget on the project by 40 per cent from $1 billion to $600 million.

Originally published by Vancouver Observer

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

Posted 3 weeks 19 hours ago

Former President Donald Trump is now openly fantasizing about deputizing death squads against Americans.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

The 2024 Republican ticket’s incitement of violence against Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, is revealing in more ways than one.

Posted 1 month 3 weeks ago

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

Posted 1 month 3 days ago

What Britain needs now is more politics, not more police.

Posted 1 month 3 weeks ago

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.