Read

User menu

Search form

Whistleblowers In Canada To Receive $1.5 Million For Exposing Corporate Crimes

Whistleblowers In Canada To Receive $1.5 Million For Exposing Corporate Crimes
Tue, 11/3/2015 - by Barbara Shecter
This article originally appeared on Financial Post

Whistleblowers in Canada could receive awards in excess of $1.5 million after a formal policy was unveiled last week by the Ontario Securities Commission to encourage those in the know to help ferret out corporate wrongdoing.

Canada’s largest securities regulator initially capped proposed awards at $1.5 million. But Tom Atkinson, the OSC’s director of enforcement, said last Monday the awards could be larger in some cases, notably if more than $10 million was collected.

He said he could not elaborate until the formal policy was unveiled, but suggested that qualifying for the higher amount would likely be tied to the collection of sanctions or settlement payments, rather than simply the assessment of money due.

The OSC surprised some market participants when the plan for a whistleblower program to encourage reporting of serious securities misconduct was unveiled in February. The original proposal stated that a whistleblower could receive up to 15 per cent of monetary sanctions or settlement payments of more than $1 million, up to the cap of $1.5 million.

During subsequent roundtables, some market participants argued that financial incentives should not be capped, and that they should be paid out to whistleblowers when their tips lead to any financial sanctions, even when those sanctions or settlement payments don’t exceed $1 million.

Some companies and law firms, meanwhile, argued that the whistleblower program would undermine internal reporting and compliance by encouraging workers to seek the regulator’s bounty. They also argued that employees could delay reporting or even encourage more wrongdoing in order to ensure the ultimate sanction was large enough for them to qualify for a financial award.

The financial incentive-backed OSC whistleblower program is to be the first of its kind introduced by a securities regulator in Canada.

In February, the OSC said it was considering taking additional steps to ensure the program’s success, such as requesting legislative amendments to the Securities Act to protect whistleblowers from retaliation in their workplaces.

The OSC policy to be unveiled Wednesday is expected to be open to further public comment, with the regulator aiming to have the program in place by next spring.

Originally published by Financial Post

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

Posted 3 weeks 2 days ago

Former President Donald Trump is now openly fantasizing about deputizing death squads against Americans.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

The 2024 Republican ticket’s incitement of violence against Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, is revealing in more ways than one.

Posted 1 month 3 weeks ago

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

Posted 1 month 5 days ago

What Britain needs now is more politics, not more police.

Posted 1 month 3 weeks ago

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?