For the second year in a row, America’s richest 14 individuals made more from their annual investments than the $80 billion provided for people in need of food. Nearly half of the food-deprived are children. Perversely, the food stamp program was CUT because of a lack of federal funding.

In a testament to the inability — or unwillingness — of Congress to do anything about the incessant upward re-distribution of America’s wealth, the richest 14 Americans increased their wealth from $507 billion to $589 billion in one year from their investment earnings.

As stated by Forbes, “All together the 400 wealthiest Americans are worth a staggering $2.29 trillion, up $270 billion from a year ago.”

The Richest 14 Made Enough Money to Hire Two Million Pre-School Teachers or Emergency Medical Technicians

Billions of dollars of wealth, derived from years of American productivity, have been transferred to a few financially savvy and well-connected individuals who have spent a generation shaping trading rules and tax laws to their own advantage.

It’s so inexplicably one-sided that the 2013 investment earnings of the richest 1% of Americans ($1.8 trillion) was more than the entire budget for Social Security ($860 billion), Medicare ($524 billion), and Medicaid ($304 billion).

Why Does So Little of Our National Wealth Go to Feed People or Provide Jobs?

The fruits of American productivity go to the richest Americans, who can afford to hold onto their fortunes, defer taxes indefinitely, and then pay a smaller capital gains rate when they eventually decide to cash in. Worse yet, they can stash their winnings overseas, tax-free.

It is estimated that $7.6 trillion of personal wealth is hidden in tax havens. That means, stunningly, that $1 of every $12 of worldwide wealth is hidden in a haven.

America has no wealth tax, no financial speculation tax, no means of stopping the rampant redistribution of money to the rich. As Noam Chomsky said, the concept of the Common Good that is being relentlessly driven into our heads demands that we focus on our own private gain, and suppress normal human emotions of solidarity, mutual support and concern for others.

Who Are These People Taking All the Big Money?

A review of the richest 20 shows that opportunism and ruthless business practices and tax avoidance, rather than entrepreneurship, vaulted these individuals to the top:

Bill Gates used someone else’s operating system to start Microsoft.

According to the New York Post, Warren Buffett’s company, Berkshire Hathaway, “openly admits that it owes back taxes since as long ago as 2002.”

Koch Industries is jeopardizing our clean air and water, moving its toxic waste to Detroit and Chicago, trying to take away the minimum wage, seeking to take down renewable energy initiatives, and laying off thousands of workers.

Walmart makes $13,000 in pre-tax profits per employee (after paying salaries), yet takes a taxpayer subsidy of $5,815 per worker.

Jeff Bezos has spent millions of dollars per year on lobbyists, lawyers, and political campaigns to maintain Amazon’s tax-free sales in order to undercut competitors and drive them out of business.

Larry Page and Sergey Brin are the founders of Google, which has gained recognition as one of the world’s biggest tax avoiders, a master at the “Double Irish” revenue shift to Bermuda tax havens, and a beneficiary of tax loopholes that bring money back to the U.S. without paying taxes on it.

Zuckerberg, like Gates, was an opportunist, overcoming superior competition with his Harvard connection, gaining better financial support, and — allegedly — hacking competitors’ computers to compromise their user data.

Job Creators?

As for the argument that Microsoft, Google, etc. created products and jobs: It was the industry that did it, supported by decades of research and innovation, and involving tens of thousands of American workers, from scientists to database clerks.

Our nation’s winner-take-all philosophy makes it look like one person did the work of all these contributors. That’s wrong as can be, especially for this year’s version of the richest Americans.

*

Meanwhile, Wilson Dizard reports for Al Jazeera America that a new Credit Suizze report reveals wealth concentration and wage stagnation increasing the risk of new recession:

As the disparity between soaring wealth and stagnating incomes becomes more entrenched, the risk of a return to recession rises, according to a new report on the effects of the unbalanced distribution of global wealth.

The analysis, by banking giant Credit Suisse, notes a record amount of household wealth around the world — some $263 trillion dollars — half of which is under the control of just 1 percent of the population.

The United States in the last year added some $12.9 trillion in personal wealth — exceeding the estimated $12.3 trillion hit the country is took during the Great Recession. Much of the accrued wealth was due to increased housing prices.

But as wealth and asset values have risen over the 12-month period, incomes have remained stagnant — creating an imbalance similar to that which has foreshadowed past downturns and crashes.

At present, the disparity between wealth and income in the U.S. is as high as it was during the Great Depression, according the Swiss bank's report.

“This is a worrying signal given that abnormally high wealth income ratios have always signaled recession in the past,” the report states.

Wealth represents assets, stocks, bonds and property owned outright. The vast majority of it is likely to be in the hands of people who are already in a financially strong position, through unequal landholding perpetuated through inheritance, the study notes.

“Financial assets are disproportionally held by wealthier cohorts,” the report states.

To Marshall Steinbaum, an economist at the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, the gap between wealthy asset holders and workers living paycheck to paycheck contributes to the fragility of the U.S. economy, where the collapse of bubbles can send the country into a tailspin.

“You have on one hand people taking out loans, and then when house prices go down, their wealth is in negative territory,” Steinbaum said.

Originally published by Nation of Change