Read

User menu

Search form

All In the Family: Here's Who's Buying The 2016 Presidential Election

All In the Family: Here's Who's Buying The 2016 Presidential Election
This article originally appeared on The New York Times

A stunning feature in the New York Times details how a mere 158 American households comprised nearly half of all the money donated to 2016 presidential campaigns thus far. These donors are disproportionately white, male, old, and unbelievably wealthy. In total, these families account for roughly $176 million dollars in political spending and it's not even 2016 yet. To put that in perspective, that's almost as much money as the entire 2000 presidential campaign cost even with inflation.

These families mainly derived their wealth from just three industries: finance, energy, and real estate. These aren't sectors where innovators bring new services and technologies to the people, but rather where capital owners use their market power to squeeze the hard-working public. Wall Street hedge fund and fossil fuels-related donors, like the Kochs, have donated a staggering amount of money to mostly Republican candidates.

Democratic-leaning billionaires exist, they simply do not come anywhere near parity in terms of giving, meaning that Republicans' boogeyman image of George Soros is a complete myth. The Republican primary is currently more competitive than the Democratic race and that disparity skews the New York Times' numbers to the right as Republican donors have more reason to give money earlier, but the ultra-rich still leaned massively towards Republicans in 2012.

Consequently, the candidates that the ultra-wealthy favor now agitate for low or even no taxes on finance, reduced social services, and corporate welfare spending for their very benefactors. Billionaire oligarchs purchase puppets on a string who kowtow to their particular demands, while politicians, who themselves are also rich, instead ignore the everyday citizen.

This is what the death of American democracy looks like. It's time to acknowledge that we no longer have a democracy, but a plutocracy: Government of the rich, by the rich, for the rich, brought to you by Citizens United and the Supreme Court.

Originally published by The New York Times

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

Ending fascists’ grip on power not only requires voting them out, but replacing them with the right people.

One pressing question is how the worldwide outrage might, and could, spread to his other business interests, not least his largest interest: SpaceX.

There is a real human cost behind cold, calculated “efficiency.”

Musk's unelected role at the forefront of U.S. government, and his company's near monopolisation of satellite internet communications, increases his global political and economic power grab, and attacks on democracy.

They’ve defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, and slashed our services. The corruption has gone too. far. No thrones. No crowns. No kings.

A rug pull occurs when a ‘meme’ or ‘shit’ coin is created, investors pour in, and the price spikes — at which point the early stakeholders sell and tank the coin’s value, as happened with the $TRUMP token.

Ending fascists’ grip on power not only requires voting them out, but replacing them with the right people.

One pressing question is how the worldwide outrage might, and could, spread to his other business interests, not least his largest interest: SpaceX.

Yarvin saw the “red pill” as the realization that the Enlightenment ideals he came to associate with “the cathedral” and democracy are actually a poison leading to societal decadence and decline.

Posted 1 month 2 weeks ago

As the American public continues to publicly stand up to the administration, Trump’s grip on power will eventually slip.

Posted 1 month 2 weeks ago

It is clear that authoritarian fascists, in the United States and elsewhere, do not want education that promotes critical thinking.

Posted 1 month 2 weeks ago

Musk's unelected role at the forefront of U.S. government, and his company's near monopolisation of satellite internet communications, increases his global political and economic power grab, and attacks on democracy.

Posted 4 weeks 10 hours ago

There is a real human cost behind cold, calculated “efficiency.”

Posted 4 weeks 9 hours ago

One pressing question is how the worldwide outrage might, and could, spread to his other business interests, not least his largest interest: SpaceX.