Read

User menu

Search form

In Districts With Widest Gender Wage Gaps, Congressmen Oppose Fair Pay Laws

In Districts With Widest Gender Wage Gaps, Congressmen Oppose Fair Pay Laws
Mon, 4/15/2013 - by Laura Bassett
This article originally appeared on Huffington Post

Four out of five of the U.S. congressional districts with the widest wage gaps between men and women are represented by congressmen who oppose equal pay laws, according to a new report by the American Association of University Women.

The most recent data from the U.S. Census Bureau shows that women earned an average 77 cents for every dollar that men earned in 2011. But in Louisiana's 3rd District, represented by Congressman Charles Boustany (R), women who work full-time only brought home about 61 percent of men's annual salaries that year.

Despite the disproportionately wide pay gap, Boustany voted against the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act in 2009. HuffPost reached out to Boustany's office on Tuesday and asked why he opposed those bills and whether he thinks the gender wage gap is a problem in his district, but he declined to comment.

The Lilly Ledbetter law, which was the first bill President Barack Obama signed in 2009, allows women greater opportunity to sue over pay inequity at the work place. The Paycheck Fairness Act has been reintroduced by Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) this year, and it would strengthen the Equal Pay Act by closing loopholes, incentivizing employers to pay women fairly and penalizing employers who discriminate based on gender.

"It's a bigger deal, a bigger bill, a more comprehensive bill than Lilly Ledbetter," said Christianne Corbett, AAUW's senior researcher. "It would make a bigger difference."

Reps. Frank Wolf (R-Va.), Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.), Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.) and Rob Bishop (R-Utah) represent the other four districts with the worst records on pay equity in the country, with full-time working women in those districts earning between 62 percent and 67 percent of men's salaries. The three Republicans all voted against the Lilly Ledbetter and Paycheck Fairness acts, while Rahall voted for them and supports the Paycheck Fairness Act of 2013.

Rahall was the only congressman who agreed to comment for this story. "On this most tangible measure of equality -- equal pay for equal work -- the road ahead is inevitably too long, but it is less rocky, thanks to efforts like the Lilly Ledbetter Act," he said in an email. "Congress must remain diligent, but so too must business and industry and our educational institutions, to champion this most basic sense of fairness.”

Originally published by HuffPost.

 

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

Posted 3 weeks 5 days ago

Former President Donald Trump is now openly fantasizing about deputizing death squads against Americans.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

The 2024 Republican ticket’s incitement of violence against Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, is revealing in more ways than one.

Posted 1 month 3 weeks ago

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

Posted 1 week 1 day ago

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?