Read

User menu

Search form

Egypt Strongman's Lop-Sided Victory Reveals Fractures, Fears – And A Revolution Still Unmet

Egypt Strongman's Lop-Sided Victory Reveals Fractures, Fears – And A Revolution Still Unmet

CAIRO – Many Egyptians are like Um Samah, a building guard in the capital's upscale neighborhood of Zamalek, who say newly announced President-elect Abdel Fattah al-Sisi can do no wrong even if he tried. To Um Samah, the former general is a national hero and savior.

That view is not only being voiced loudly these days in Egypt, but is being actively encouraged – because if one happens to think differently of the strong man slated to be the country's next president, one now runs the risk of being called anti-Egyptian. In public, al-Sisi has become a man you don't disagree with, but revere and look up to.

"His voice and face throw terror in the hearts of enemies," Um Samah says, referring to the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood and other dissidents, but also the supporters of losing opposition candidate Hamdeen Sabahi.

Across Zamalek and other Cairo neighborhoods, giant banners show a lion in the background with pictures of national heroes Gamal Abdel Nasser, Anwar el-Sadat and al-Sisi – while ousted presidents Hosni Mubarak and Mohamed Morsi, both in prison, remain noticeably absent.

The new era of al-Sisi was ushered in with mass street celebrations even hours before the voting polls closed last week.

On Tuesday, Egypt announced the expected results from its latest attempt at the democratic process, with former military chief al-Sisi garnering 96.9 percent of the vote in a landslide victory. Sabahi earned a reported 310,000 votes in polls which saw boycotts amid popular demands to end Egypt's single-player system.

The Election Committee said voter turnout was 47 percent.

"It's a historic moment for Egyptian history and for Arab nations' history," Karem Mahmoud, the head of al-Sisi's election campaign, told state TV.

Campaign Frustration

Late on May 27, which was supposed to be the final day of voting, the High Election Committee announced it was extending voting one additional day “due to high heat on the second day” in order to give more people a chance to cast their ballot.

Officially, the election results were supposed to be announced on June 5, but al-Sisi supporters felt confident enough to begin celebrations as the polls were closing. Underdog candidate Hamdeen Sabahi and his campaign were furious over the extension and threatened to pull out of the race.

His campaign said at the time that it believed voter turnout to be quite low, with estimates of around 30 percent of eligible voters – nearly 20 percent below the official final tally. By extending the election, Sabahi’s campaign argued it gave more time for al-Sisi to widen the margin.

But with less than five percent of the vote – at least officially – in his favor, the battle was an uphill one from the beginning.

Societal Discord

The election has once more polarized the country's people over the strain of politics, as families and friends fought over whom to vote for and why – with some relatives refusing to speak to one another if they didn’t agree on the candidate.

“I voted for Sisi not because I like him,” said Rana, a graduate in English literature, who declined to give her surname. “I voted for Sisi because I really hate the Brotherhood,” the group al-Sisi helped topple after tens of millions of Egyptians took to the streets on June 30, 2013, protesting the rule of then-President Mohamed Morsi.

But later, it was al-Sisi who led the round-up of tens of thousands of dissenters under a controversial Protest Law that established strict rules for public assembly and helped the military curtail public discord. The law reached a culmination with the removal of popular TV satirist Bassem Youssef, whose program Al-Bernamag captured the nation with its humorous criticisms of the military government.

Speaking at one of Cairo’s upscale cafes, where politics and the election were being discussed as young kids glanced at their iPhone for updates, Rana said that “many cannot even begin to imagine an Egypt where the Brotherhood would have any chance for taking over power."

"It was devastating to people,” she continued. “They pitted everyone against each other in the name of religion.”

The Brotherhood, which Rana and millions of other Egyptians despise, became the victims of an al-Sisi-led massacre after he ordered the military to dispel a largely peaceful sit-in by Morsi supporters who were demanding that the president be returned to power.

On August 13, 2013, the military stormed the popular square where thousands had camped out. The ensuing violence and death has been dubbed the Raba’a Square Massacre after 800 Brotherhood supporters were killed under government watch.

But Rana refused to discuss the incident. “Can’t you see the terror attacks they are doing now, or has the world forgot what happened at Ittihadiya?” she said, referring to the Brotherhood-led attack on protesters in December of 2012, when citizens were calling for the ouster of Morsi at the Presidential Palace, or Itahidiya. At least a dozen people were killed and hundreds injured in the overnight classes that saw the Brotherhood mobilize a well-armed attack.

The incident stoked fears in the Egyptian populace, which six months later took to the streets by the millions and brought Morsi down – paving the way for al-Sisi, the head of the military, to return to power.

Now, the elections have revealed stark, new divisions in Egyptian society as public criticism of al-Sisi becomes an “at your own risk” endeavor. In one publicized incident, a man at a photocopying shop became embroiled in a disagreement over politics and the election.

The young woman behind the desk disagreed with him on what she called his blind support for al-Sisi. Lashing out, the man responded by calling her “un-Egyptian."

“A vote for Sisi is a vote for Egypt," he told her, "and if you are not Egyptian then you should leave the country.”

As Egypt becomes increasingly fractured, and as politics continues to deepen its influence on people's daily lives, the election – and al-Sisi's ongoing victory celebrations – seems to have only heightened the tensions and frustrations that are brewing.

 

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

Posted 3 weeks 6 days ago

Former President Donald Trump is now openly fantasizing about deputizing death squads against Americans.

Posted 1 month 2 weeks ago

The 2024 Republican ticket’s incitement of violence against Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, is revealing in more ways than one.

Posted 1 month 4 weeks ago

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

Posted 1 week 2 days ago

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?