Read

User menu

Search form

Student Debt Cancellation: The Hidden Tax Trap That Will Cripple America's Families

Student Debt Cancellation: The Hidden Tax Trap That Will Cripple America's Families
Thu, 4/9/2015 - by Ira B Dember

As a popular movement, student debt cancellation continues to gather momentum. Students, former students, their parents and grandparents – entire families caught in the $1.16 trillion student debt morass – yearn for the day when today's Wall Street-driven barriercomes crashing down, freeing some 40 million families to strive for prosperity without unfair, unequal student debt defeating them. Average individual student debt now soars close to the $30,000 mark, up from $23,000 just seven years ago.

There’s just one catch.

Under current federal tax rules, when student debts are cancelled, millions of families will get blindsided by a staggering tax bill. It will force many folks into sudden, unexpected financial ruin. Many people will lose their homes or be forced to sell. Many will go bankrupt. And many will trade student-debt collectors for even more powerful IRS debt collectors.

Without a change in tax rules, it could be “out of the frying pan, into the fire” for cash-strapped families.

The problem: Uncle Sam treats forgiven debt as income. Under normal circumstances, this policy helps prevent tax fraud. Imagine, if any forgiven debt were tax-free, your employer could “loan” you your salary. You’d still owe your employer the money. But then, wink-wink, s/he would forgive your debt and presto, you wouldn’t owe any income tax because you had no income – only forgiven debt. Real-world cases might be less ham-handed, but you get the idea.

That’s under normal circumstances. But student debt is anything but normal. It’s the product of a rigged system that propels economic inequality and helps keep poor folks poor. Erasing student debt is not the same as trying to trick the IRS out of taxing your salary.

So, tax rules aimed at heading off fraud would have the unintended consequence of devastating millions of families across America – precisely what student debt cancellation is supposed to prevent.

Here’s how it would work. Say you and your family borrow $40,000 to cover four years of room and board at an in-state public college (rounded to the 2014-15 national average). Suddenly that debt is cancelled. Congratulations, taxable income in your student-debt jubilee year just got jacked up by $40,000.

Let’s say you are working a typical crummy job for $10 an hour, grossing maybe $20,000 a year. Now, at the stroke of a pen, you owe federal income tax not on $20,000, but on $60,000 gross income for this year.

If you pay state income tax, brace yourself again. Many states figure your tax based on a percentage of federal income tax. More pain.

Can this really happen? Absolutely. Here’s a sobering example reported by The New York Times:

A 66-year-old disabled man accumulated over $150,000 of student debt because he helped his three kids through college. He could manage these debts because he held a good job – until life-threatening illness and medical complications forced him out of work. Medical bills piled up. He qualified for a “disability discharge” of the student debt, but because the forgiven loans became taxable income, he now owed the IRS $59,000. He spent thousands of dollars he could ill afford on a tax lawyer, who bargained the IRS down to $25,000. Maybe. As the Times story went to press, the man still didn’t know if the IRS would accept even this crippling deal. He was getting ready to sell his house, in part to pay the IRS.

Numerous organizations warn of tax impacts stemming from student debt forgiveness. But because it’s relatively rare, few people take notice. It’s why devastating tax impacts remain hidden in plain sight.

That’s about to change in a humongous way – when the student debt cancellation movement triumphs and perhaps a trillion dollars of student debt goes poof.

Some student debt can be cancelled tax-free. Here’s a sample rule from the Internal Revenue Code, section 108(f)(1): In the case of an individual, gross income does not include any amount which (but for this subsection) would be includible in gross income by reason of the discharge (in whole or in part) of any student loan if such discharge was pursuant to a provision of such loan under which all or part of the indebtedness of the individual would be discharged if the individual worked for a certain period of time in certain professions for any of a broad class of employers.

Got that? You’ll need a tax lawyer to figure out this and other convoluted rules. Can you afford thousands of dollars to hire one?

That’s part of the trap: if you could afford specialized legal help and the hefty tax bite that comes with student loan cancellation, you could likely afford to cover your student loans – whether they’re fair or not – with relative ease. For most people, that’s out of the question.

Without broad protection from current tax rules, a lot of decent, hardworking folks are going to be in for a very nasty surprise. That’s why Strike Debt and other movement leaders must demand that simple, straightforward and across-the-board tax relief go hand in hand with student debt cancellation.

Otherwise, millions of families will get blindsided. And broken.

Ira B Dember does strategic consulting and writing, starts ventures and tackles public policy issues as part of Commonomics USA, advocating economic solutions that grow our common wealth.

 

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

From a pro-democratic perspective, civil society and new media organisations are surging in the aftermath of the Orban regime.

The country’s new prime minister, Andy Burnham, has promised a break from the politics of the last 40 years—realizing more broadly that Labour must stand up for the 99% against big business, or the party will become irrelevant.

The tragic shooting of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo is just the latest example of ICE having a fundamental disrespect for human life — further proving why the agency should be stripped of funding and shut down, and its rank-and-file agents and leadership prosecuted.

While the U.S., EU and their allies are enabling Rojava—the strongest force against Islamic State— to fall, it is vital for internationalists to continue to support this beacon of democracy and liberation.

June 23, 2026 may be remembered as the beginning of the end of the Democratic Party establishment.

The current wave of food recalls is a direct byproduct of President Donald Trump’s administration deliberately removing the safeguards put in place aimed at protecting American consumers more than a century ago.

From a pro-democratic perspective, civil society and new media organisations are surging in the aftermath of the Orban regime.

We can still celebrate success while simultaneously putting a cap on net worth.

The country’s new prime minister, Andy Burnham, has promised a break from the politics of the last 40 years—realizing more broadly that Labour must stand up for the 99% against big business, or the party will become irrelevant.

Much like the resistance to AI data centers, the opposition to Flock surveillance cameras has brought the left and the right together against billionaires who are trying to force America into becoming even more of a police state.

Much like the resistance to AI data centers, the opposition to Flock surveillance cameras has brought the left and the right together against billionaires who are trying to force America into becoming even more of a police state.

Posted 1 month 4 weeks ago

The country’s new prime minister, Andy Burnham, has promised a break from the politics of the last 40 years—realizing more broadly that Labour must stand up for the 99% against big business, or the party will become irrelevant.

Posted 1 month 4 weeks ago

We can still celebrate success while simultaneously putting a cap on net worth.

Posted 1 month 2 weeks ago

The current wave of food recalls is a direct byproduct of President Donald Trump’s administration deliberately removing the safeguards put in place aimed at protecting American consumers more than a century ago.

Posted 3 weeks 17 hours ago

From a pro-democratic perspective, civil society and new media organisations are surging in the aftermath of the Orban regime.

Posted 3 weeks 3 days ago

The current wave of food recalls is a direct byproduct of President Donald Trump’s administration deliberately removing the safeguards put in place aimed at protecting American consumers more than a century ago.

From a pro-democratic perspective, civil society and new media organisations are surging in the aftermath of the Orban regime.