Read

User menu

Search form

Why Did U.S. Spend $43 Million To Build A Single Gas Station In Afghanistan?

Why Did U.S. Spend $43 Million To Build A Single Gas Station In Afghanistan?
Wed, 11/4/2015 - by Al Jazeera America
This article originally appeared on Al Jazeera America

The U.S. Department of Defense spent an estimated $43 million to build a single gas station in Afghanistan, the federal government’s oversight authority for reconstruction in the Central Asian country said Monday. The revelation marks the latest example of alleged overspending identified by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR).

SIGAR’s report called the plan to build a compressed natural gas (CNG) filling station in the small northern Afghan city of Sheberghan “ill-conceived,” and said it came at an “exorbitant cost to U.S. taxpayers.” The report noted that the gas station should have cost roughly $500,000.

“Even considering security costs associated with construction and operation in Afghanistan, this level of expenditure appears gratuitous and extreme,” SIGAR said in its report.

The Department of Defense did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Al Jazeera.

SIGAR’s report was based on a study by the Task Force for Business and Stability Operations (TFBSO), established by the Department of Defense in 2006 to bolster the economies of post-U.S. occupation Iraq and Afghanistan.

The TFBSO study showed that the Department of Defense spent $42,718,739 between 2011 and 2014 to build the gas station, and that its goal was to further Afghanistan’s reliance on its own natural resources.

Between 1980 and 2012, Afghanistan imported 100 percent of its refined petroleum products, the report said, adding that CNG “costs approximately 50 percent less than a comparable amount of gasoline in Afghanistan and burns cleaner than gasoline.”

The SIGAR report blasted the Department of Defense for failing to provide an explanation for the overspending.

“One of the most troubling aspects of this project is that the Department of Defense claims that it is unable to provide an explanation for the high cost the project or to answer any other questions concerning its planning, implementation or outcome,” Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction John F. Sopko said in a letter to Defense Secretary Ashton Carter that accompanied the report.

Sopko told Al Jazeera in June that the United States had been wasteful in Afghanistan. He said Washington built “things that didn’t work; things that the Afghans didn’t know about, didn’t want or can’t use; and things that can’t be sustained.”

“We identified, for example, $400 to $500 million for airplanes that the U.S. purchased for the Afghan Air Force. The Afghan Air Force couldn’t use them. They were the wrong planes for the country. They basically had to be destroyed, and we got three cents on the dollar,” Sopko said.

SIGAR in December 2014 published a report saying that U.S. development authorities had failed to track the results of millions of dollars spent to improve medical care and professional training for women in Afghanistan.

Originally published by Al Jazeera America

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

Posted 3 weeks 5 days ago

Former President Donald Trump is now openly fantasizing about deputizing death squads against Americans.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

The 2024 Republican ticket’s incitement of violence against Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, is revealing in more ways than one.

Posted 1 month 3 weeks ago

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

Posted 1 week 1 day ago

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?