Read

User menu

Search form

12 Wisconsin Cities to Vote: End Corporate Personhood, Overturn Citizens United?

12 Wisconsin Cities to Vote: End Corporate Personhood, Overturn Citizens United?
Mon, 11/3/2014 - by Deirdre Fulton
This article originally appeared on Common Dreams

Wisconsin residents in 12 communities will vote this week on whether to amend the U.S. Constitution to overturn Citizens United, end corporate personhood, and get big money out of politics.

In Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission, the U.S. Supreme Court found that corporations have a First Amendment right to spend unlimited amounts of money to influence the outcome of elections.

In Milwaukee County, Dunn County, Green Bay, Appleton, Fond du Lac, Neenah, Menasha, Ripon, Stoughton, Oregon, Wausau, and the Village of Park Ridge, voters will cast their ballots on a proposed amendment that would essentially reverse the Court's 2010 decision by stating that corporations are not people and money is not speech.

The referenda "are an expression of the will of local people," Kaja Rebane, co-chair of the Wisconsin Move to Amend network, told Common Dreams. It was just over three years ago that Madison and Dane County became the first municipalities in the country to pass ballot measures aimed at abolishing corporate personhood.

"At that time, I don't think any of us had any idea that it would spread as quickly as it has," Rebane said. That the idea did catch on so rapidly, she said, is evidence that "we the people want democracy, not corporatocracy."

"The Supreme Court changed the meaning of the 1st Amendment, and we want it changed back," added Mary Laan, the Move to Amend leader in Milwaukee County.

Should the non-binding measures pass, these communities will join more than 40 others in Wisconsin that have already endorsed such an amendment, along with 16 state legislatures and almost 600 towns, villages, cities, counties, and organizations across the country.

The ballot questions have garnered bipartisan support, Rebane said, noting that previous referenda have passed with high margins in red, blue, and purple parts of the state.

Wisconsin state Senator Dale Schultz, a Republican, has said: "We're talking about billionaires turning this country into a Russian-style oligarchy, where there are two dozen billionaires who buy the whole political process... we are awash in money because of Citizens United, and it puts good people in both parties in a difficult situation."

A similar ballot measure—which would have overturned Citizens United "to allow the full regulation or limitation of campaign contributions and spending, to ensure that all citizens, regardless of wealth, may express their views to one another, and to make clear that the rights protected by the United States Constitution are the rights of natural persons only"—was booted from the California ballot by that state's Supreme Court in August.

In Massachusetts, where the state legislature has already passed a vaguely worded resolution calling on Congress "to pass and send to the states for ratification a constitutional amendment to restore the First Amendment and fair elections to the people," voters in 18 districts will have the chance to vote on November 4 for a ballot question that reads:

"Shall the representative from this district be instructed to vote in favor of a resolution calling upon Congress to propose an amendment to the U.S. Constitution affirming that 1) rights protected under the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only and 2) both Congress and the States may place limits on political contributions and political spending?"

And equivalent measures are on the ballot in three Ohio towns: Mentor, Chagrin Falls, and Lakewood.

An amendment to the U.S. Constitution may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. A successfully proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 of 50).

A push to advance the "Democracy for All" amendment failed in the U.S. Senate in September.

Originally published by Common Dreams

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

There are multiple similarities between Trump and the British monarch when looking at the 27 grievances the framers outlined in their 1776 declaration.

It is not hyperbole to say that the world’s richest man has now illegally seized control of America’s checkbook and the entire federal workforce.

Over the next four years, we’re about to be inundated with a flood of lies—including from federal agencies themselves.

We have to be smart in how we fight against Trump and the Republican Party this time around. That means picking our battles wisely, and not taking bait that’s dangled in front of our faces.

Over the next two years, Democrats have the unfettered ability to be an albatross around the neck of the GOP — and to make sure that what little they manage to get done due to their paper-thin majorities becomes the reason for their undoing.

There are multiple similarities between Trump and the British monarch when looking at the 27 grievances the framers outlined in their 1776 declaration.

The grassroots opposition to President Donald Trump is hitting the streets everywhere.

Protests are set to take place in several major cities across the U.S. on Monday, the Presidents Day holiday, according to activists.

It is not hyperbole to say that the world’s richest man has now illegally seized control of America’s checkbook and the entire federal workforce.

Over the next four years, we’re about to be inundated with a flood of lies—including from federal agencies themselves.

This last month has shown America that society will gladly tolerate vigilante violence, provided a vigilante chooses the right target.

Posted 2 months 1 day ago

Over the next two years, Democrats have the unfettered ability to be an albatross around the neck of the GOP — and to make sure that what little they manage to get done due to their paper-thin majorities becomes the reason for their undoing.

Posted 1 month 3 days ago

Over the next four years, we’re about to be inundated with a flood of lies—including from federal agencies themselves.

Posted 1 week 5 days ago

We have to be smart in how we fight against Trump and the Republican Party this time around. That means picking our battles wisely, and not taking bait that’s dangled in front of our faces.

Posted 2 weeks 5 days ago

It is not hyperbole to say that the world’s richest man has now illegally seized control of America’s checkbook and the entire federal workforce.

Posted 1 week 5 days ago

The way the urban commons create a space to solve material problems and enable social movements to forge city-wide networks are antidotes to people being attracted towards the far-right.

We have to be smart in how we fight against Trump and the Republican Party this time around. That means picking our battles wisely, and not taking bait that’s dangled in front of our faces.