Read

User menu

Search form

A Film About the Fed, Funded by the Mortgage Crisis

A Film About the Fed, Funded by the Mortgage Crisis
Thu, 10/3/2013 - by Brett Brownell
This article originally appeared on Mother Jones

Hindsight may be 20/20, but luckily for filmmaker Jim Bruce, so was his foresight into the financial crisis of 2008. Prior to the collapse of the housing market, Bruce was a film editor for movies like "X-Men: The Last Stand" and "The Incredible Hulk." But Bruce also had been reading up on financial news and recognized that many of the biggest banks were over-leveraged and at risk of failing.

"I was writing an email newsletter to family and friends starting in late 2006 saying 'watch out'," he recalls. "You didn't have to be a rocket scientist to see how bad the mortgages being given out were." Bruce recognized that a small increase in foreclosures would wipe out the over-extended lenders. So while millions of Americans invested in new homes, Bruce was investing in their implosion.

"All I did was short home builders and banks," he explains. His short bets paid off big, as Countrywide tumbled and AIG collapsed, doubling his investment. Now what to do with all that money? The answer: Make a down payment on a documentary about the Federal Reserve, which Bruce believed had not been held accountable for its role in creating the financial crash that made him a bundle.

The product of Bruce's back-handed thank-you is "Money for Nothing," a sometimes harsh, sometimes cautious critique of the Fed and its 100-year history. The film includes many candid interviews with current and former members of this immensely powerful financial institution, including active regional governors and current vice chair Janet Yellen (who many suspect will replace current chairman Ben Bernanke to become the first woman to lead the central bank).

Clearly missing from the collection of direct interviews are Bernanke and former Fed chair Alan Greenspan. "We reached out and were declined several times," Bruce says. He did, however, nab an interview with former Fed chair Paul Volker, who made tough decisions in the early 1980s to tighten the Federal Reserve's monetary policies to reduce inflation. Initially, Volker was tough on Bruce as well.

"When I first met with him," Bruce recalls, "he really kind of grilled me about 'Where are you from? And who's funding this?' It kind of scared the life out of me." Eventually, Volker agreed to speak, and shared his opinions about the mistakes the Fed had made, such as avoiding stricter regulation of the mortgage market.

Critics of "Money for Nothing," such as Wall Street Journal economics editor David Wessel, have called it out for showing a mostly minority opinion of the Fed's policies. "I think the average person gets the majority view all the time," Bruce responds. "All they hear, if anything, is what Ben Bernanke thinks. And I think conventional wisdom was proven to be so wrong in the years leaning up to the crisis."

But Bruce does give credit to the Fed for saving the financial system, and his proposed fix for its problems is a traditionally conservative one. He and many of his subjects want a less risky system—one with more value placed on savings and less on debt.

Fans of the film have sent Bruce additional materials, such as a chart showing instances of laughter found in the transcripts of the Federal Open Market Committee (the Fed's regularly scheduled meetings). Transcripts are made public after about five years, so this peek behind the curtain ends in late 2007. But note how things were no longer quite so funny as the meltdown of 2008 approached.

Also of note, the familiar voice you'll hear narrating the documentary is Liev Schreiber of "X-Men: Origins" and Showtime's "Ray Donovan."

"Money for Nothing" opened Friday, September 27, in New York City, Los Angeles, Santa Ana, and Denver. Future openings and screenings are listed on the film's website.

Originally published by Mother Jones

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

Posted 3 weeks 3 days ago

Former President Donald Trump is now openly fantasizing about deputizing death squads against Americans.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

The 2024 Republican ticket’s incitement of violence against Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, is revealing in more ways than one.

Posted 1 month 3 weeks ago

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

Posted 1 month 5 days ago

What Britain needs now is more politics, not more police.

Posted 1 month 3 weeks ago

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.