Read

User menu

Search form

It's Official: Living Standards Have Dropped In Britain. So Who Will Voters Elect?

It's Official: Living Standards Have Dropped In Britain. So Who Will Voters Elect?
Wed, 5/6/2015 - by Gabrielle Pickard-Whitehead

The U.K. is preparing to cast votes on Thursday in what is, by common accord, the most difficult-to-predict and closely fought General Election in a generation.

Yet as the political parties battle it out in the final stages of their election campaigns, a recent report about Britain's falling living standards sheds further doubt on the sanity of Britain voting the Tories back for a further term in government.

The report, compiled by the Trades Union Congress (TUC), concludes that during the Conservative-led Coalition government’s last five years in power, Britain has seen its sharpest decline in living standards since modern records began in 1960.

The report found that average living standards in the U.K. have fallen by 0.6% since 2009/10 – a conclusion reached by analyzing numbers from the Office of National Statistics and Real Household Disposable Income (RHDI), which looks at current levels of income, inflation, taxes and benefits.

The figures compare to the five years ending in 2009 when, under a Labour government, U.K. living standards rose by 6.9%. The nation’s living standards and quality of life have been a key debate in the run-up to the 2015 General Election, with the Tories incessantly bleating on about Britain’s economy being back on track; boasting about how they halved the deficit; reporting that more people are back in work than ever before, and that Britain is “strong and growing stronger each day.”

In his 2015 budget, Chancellor George Osborne claimed that the average standard of living for U.K. citizens would be higher when the Conservatives’ term in parliament comes to a close than when it began five years ago. Those claims, however, directly contradict the research compiled by the TUC which, with 51 affiliated unions representing almost 6 million working people, is popularly known as “the voice of Britain.”

Deep and Rapid Cuts

According to the TUC, the coalition’s detrimental austerity policies of “deep and rapid cuts” have resulted in living standards in the country being worse than they were during the financial crisis of 2007/8, which was the toughest recession Britain has suffered in the post-War era.

How the government calculates Britain’s standard of living statistics differs from how the TUC conducts its research. The TUC calculates the RHDI on a per head basis. The measures differ because Osborne was comparing RHDI at the end of 2015 with the RHDI in 2010, whereas the TUC compared average RHDI per head between 2010 and 2014 with the average of the previous five years.

According to the TUC report, the Tory-led government has failed to deliver promises to raise the living standards of citizens and is instead directly to blame for the tightening of real disposable income and the fall of living standards.

It asserts that a combination of Conservative policies have collectively impacted the decrease in living standards, including wage rises running until recently slower than inflation, a reduction of state benefits and tax increases neutralized by tax cuts.

Austerity has Failed

Frances O’Grady, general secretary of the TUC, said that in the wake of the living standards report, it was clear that austerity had failed and that Britain’s workers are “paying a heavy price” for the austerity policies of recent years.

“Austerity has failed, there’s still a major deficit, jobs are less secure and workers’ living standards have fallen,” said O’Grady, adding that Conservatives’ plans for “extreme austerity” following the election risk killing off the recovery again.

“It would be like Groundhog Day for living standards, making families worse off and cutting public services down to a stump,” O’Grady warned.

The TUC findings follows an earlier report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies that revealed the U.K.’s poorest areas have suffered the worst effects from the Coalition’s austerity measures.

Similar to O’Grady’s warnings, the IFS warned that if austerity policies aren't changed in the next government, the nation’s poorest neighborhoods will be exposed to even harsher cuts.

With the Tories threatening even deeper cuts, many of Labour’s pledges – including raising the minimum wage to £8 an hour by 2020, extending free childcare, scrapping the bedroom tax, temporarily freezing energy prices and capping rent increases within three-year contracts – are being welcomed by many voters.

However, as such pledges are seen as merely tinkering around the edges of the economic crisis facing working people in Britain, many voters desperate to see living standards improve are looking to other parties to cast their vote.

Fighting Westminster’s Obsession with Austerity

In a meeting at Westminster in December, the leaders of the Green Party for England and Wales, the Scottish National Party and Plaid Cymru (Party of Wales) pledged to unite to “battle the Westminster parties’ obsession with austerity.”

During the meeting, the three leaders agreed that with no end in sight to the government’s failed austerity agenda, the 2015 General Election is an opportunity to change U.K. politics for the better.

The TUC’s report confirming that U.K. living standards have dropped under a Tory-led government is further confirmation to what the campaigners for political change in Britain have been saying all along: austerity doesn’t work, and it's time to try something new.

 

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

Biden cared more about the appearance of having an independent DOJ untainted by politics than he did about holding an unrepentant criminal ex-president accountable.

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Biden cared more about the appearance of having an independent DOJ untainted by politics than he did about holding an unrepentant criminal ex-president accountable.

The country has never moved as close to the course it took under Benito Mussolini as it is doing now — and even if Meloni is not a neo-fascist politician, she has put herself in a position to appeal to and broaden fascism's political base.

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

Posted 1 month 2 weeks ago

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

Posted 1 month 3 weeks ago

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

Posted 3 weeks 6 days ago

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Posted 1 month 2 weeks ago

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The country has never moved as close to the course it took under Benito Mussolini as it is doing now — and even if Meloni is not a neo-fascist politician, she has put herself in a position to appeal to and broaden fascism's political base.