Read

User menu

Search form

Tax Time: How Corporations Are Cheating Schoolchildren

Tax Time: How Corporations Are Cheating Schoolchildren
Tue, 4/5/2016 - by Paul Buchheit
This article originally appeared on Nation of Change

Many of the largest U.S. corporations aren’t paying the state taxes that should be funding our schools. Kids are the victims. So are the average Americans who are forced to pay higher property taxes, sales taxes, and excise taxes to meet educational budgets. Government and media sources would have us believe there’s no alternative, for in a market-driven world it’s heresy to make demands of big business, even when the companies are flagrantly avoiding their taxes.

Illinois: Schools Held Hostage by Just Six Corporate Tax Avoiders

The mayor and governor of Illinois are blaming each other for the Chicago Public School budget crisis, and Illinois colleges are in danger of being shut down. But Illinois lost over $1.3 billion (more than the $1.1 billion school budget shortfall) in 2015 state tax revenue to just six companies (Abbott, ADM, Boeing, Deere, Exelon, United), which together paid much less than 1% of their profits in state taxes, just pennies on the dollar for the required rate of 7.75%.

Yet it’s the children and the taxpayers of Illinois who bear the burden of reform. Illinois has one of the “Ten Most Regressive State Tax Systems,” according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. In Chicago, Mayor Emanuel recently announced another $200 million in education cuts and then raised property taxes by a half-billion dollars, but the mainstream media repeatedly hushes up the corporate tax avoidance.

California: Funding Goes to Charters as Corporations Take Tax Refunds

In California, where depleted public schools are giving way to business-happy ‘reformers’ and charter schools, Google took a $400 million refund on its $8 billion in U.S. profits. Chevron has over half of its oil and gas wells in the United States, yet the company claimed a loss of nearly $3 billion in the U.S., a foreign profit of $7.7 billion, and a refund on all its U.S. taxes. Intel managed to pay 1/2 of one percent in state taxes, on nearly $9 billion in U.S. profits.

The East Coast: Big Corporate Profits, Zero Tax Dollars for the Schools

New York City has nearly a half-million students in overcrowded classrooms in the most segregated city in the nation. Yet New-York-based Pfizer, which had $35 billion in profits over the past three years, has claimed massive losses in the U.S. despite having nearly half of its sales here, and just took an $8 million 2015 state tax refund while it prepares for future tax-slashing with an overseas inversion deal.

Pfizer CEO Ian Read complained that U.S. taxes had his company fighting “with one hand tied behind our back.”

Just across the water in Connecticut is General Electric, which has paid little or no state income tax for years, and has now announced a move to Boston with a new state subsidy of $180,000 for every job it creates, even though Boston schools face a $50 million budget shortfall in 2016.

Insidious Tricks to Keep Tax Money Away from the Schools

Fake Loans: The New York Times reports on a practice called “earnings stripping,” by which a company undergoing an inversion ‘borrows’ money from its foreign partner and then deducts interest on the debt. In effect writing off the money that it lends to itself.

Fake Taxes: Berkshire Hathaway (Warren Buffett’s company) uses hypothetical amounts to ‘pay’ its taxes, which in actuality have been deferred for many years. Exxon, which uses a theoretical tax to ‘pay’ its bill, declared almost none of its 2015 income ($22 billion) in the U.S. even though about 80 percent of its productive oil and gas wells are in this country.

Sinking Lower: Taking School Revenue from Poor Nations: Action Aid reports: “Women and girls in the world’s poorest countries need good schools and hospitals…A little-known mechanism by which countries lose corporate tax revenue is a global network of binding tax treaties between countries.” Lacking such a treaty, corporations have another strategy: lawsuits against poor countries, in the style of modern trade agreements.

Summary of Shame

Big business might claim that their minimal taxes are a result of agreements made with states to promote economic growth and create jobs. But the facts come from Good Jobs First and The New York Times, reporting on 2011-12 data:

• Federal, state, and local governments give up $170 billion per year in tax incentives.

• States were forced to cut public services and raise taxes by a collective $156 billion in 2011.

• The subsidy cost per job averaged $456,000 for 170 ‘megadeals’ analyzed by Good Jobs First.

It’s a devious double whammy: Taxpayers are giving money to the corporations and then paying a second time to meet the needs of the underfunded public schools. Corporate annual reports never mention the need to support the U.S. educational system that helped make their companies prosperous.

Originally published by Nation of Change

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

Posted 4 weeks 11 hours ago

Former President Donald Trump is now openly fantasizing about deputizing death squads against Americans.

Posted 1 month 2 weeks ago

The 2024 Republican ticket’s incitement of violence against Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, is revealing in more ways than one.

Posted 1 month 4 weeks ago

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

Posted 1 week 3 days ago

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.