Read

User menu

Search form

Republicans Are Planning to Unravel Wall Street Reform

Republicans Are Planning to Unravel Wall Street Reform
Tue, 3/6/2018
This article originally appeared on Indivisible

House Republicans voted to gut the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law this past summer with legislation called the “Financial Choice Act.”Now, on the heels of a huge giveaway to the rich and corporations with the #GOPTaxScam, the Senate is back with its own version of Wall Street de-regulation. Tell your Senator to vote no the deceivingly-titled “Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (S. 2155).”
 

This Bill Puts Us at Risk of Another Financial Crisis

The Wall Street reform law requires that the country’s largest banks be subject to responsible oversight, to safeguard against another crisis that the collapse of a large bank could cause. Current law requires any bank larger than $50 billion – the 38 biggest banks in the country – be subject to certain standards.

But this bill would quintuple that threshold to $250 billion. That means two dozen of the country’s largest banks – that together received $47 billion in TARP “bailout” funds – would escape the oversight intended to prevent another financial crisis. These are banks as big as the toxic subprime lender Countrywide.

It also means that banks that are currently failing government “stress tests” – periodic checks to ensure that they won't blow up the economy – would no longer have to undergo the current tests.
 

It Allows Racial Discrimination in Mortgage Lending to Go Unchecked

Currently, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act requires most banks to collect demographic information when they originate mortgages. Collection of this data helps track patterns of application, denials, and volume along lines of race to ensure that discrimination in lending doesn’t continue to fuel broader, systemic racial inequality.

This bill would exempt the vast majority of mortgage lenders from new data collection requirements passed after the subprime crash – leading to an information vacuum that will hurt communities of color.
 

It Erodes Critical Consumer Protections

A number of key consumer protections put in place by Dodd-Frank to protect everyday homebuyers against the predatory behavior of banks are repealed or eroded by this bill. Guaranteed protection from surprise insurance fees and taxes that have been shown to reduce foreclosures are eliminated. Makers of manufactured homes are exempted from truth in lending requirements, putting rural and low-income homebuyers at risk of predatory lending.

Rural homebuyers are particularly at risk from a new provision that could lead to homes being overvalued at the time of purchase, putting them at greater risk of owing more on their mortgage than the value of their home. And it allows lenders to surprise buyers with new predatory loan terms at the time of closing, without adequate time for review. These changes and more tilt the playing field back in favor of the big banks and put consumers at risk.
 

...All of This in the Name of "Helping Community Banks"

Proponents of this bill – Democrats included – say this bill is about helping the community banks and credit unions in their state. But this legislation goes far beyond that. In fact, it was flawed from the start: Senate Republicans began by copying and pasting more than a dozen sections from the CHOICE Act. While the rest of it isn’t as radically extreme, it is still a terrible bill that favors banks over people and allows the same risk in our financial system that the Wall Street reform law eliminated – risk that caused the financial crisis.

If Senators wanted to pass a community banking bill, they could pass a community banking bill. This is not it. In fact, prominent beneficiaries of this bill are international banks like Deutsche Bank, Barclays, and Santander – hardly your community bank on the corner. Community banks have legitimate concerns that should be addressed but this legislation goes far beyond that – far enough that your Senator should oppose it.

Tell your Senator to oppose the "Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act"

Originally published by Indivisible

3 WAYS TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

ONE-TIME DONATION

Just use the simple form below to make a single direct donation.

DONATE NOW

MONTHLY DONATION

Be a sustaining sponsor. Give a reacurring monthly donation at any level.

GET SOME MERCH!

Now you can wear your support too! From T-Shirts to tote bags.

SHOP TODAY

Sign Up

Article Tabs

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

The country has never moved as close to the course it took under Benito Mussolini as it is doing now — and even if Meloni is not a neo-fascist politician, she has put herself in a position to appeal to and broaden fascism's political base.

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

As Trump’s campaign grows increasingly bizarre, his team appears to be more tightly controlling his movements and carefully scripting his public appearances to minimize the negative impact his erratic behavior may have on undecided voters in swing states.

On the eve of the historic November vote, it seems important to ask: What's wrong with men, how did we get here, and can we change this?

Posted 1 month 1 day ago

Former President Donald Trump is now openly fantasizing about deputizing death squads against Americans.

Posted 1 month 2 weeks ago

Throughout history, fascist governments have had a similar reliance on the use of lies as a weapon to take and retain power.

Posted 1 month 1 week ago

The American people clearly spoke, and the drubbing Democrats received requires looking beyond just issue polls, voting patterns, campaign strategy, or get-out-the-vote tactics.

Posted 1 week 6 days ago

The recent decisions by two of the most influential national newspapers of record to not publish their endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris says a lot about how seriously they take Trump’s threats to democracy and his promises of vengeance against his enemies.

Posted 4 weeks 8 hours ago